Access your online account from any web browser.
Two-way SMS functionality that integrates with multiple platforms.
Manage your SMS communications from your desktop.
Send bulk SMS text messages using our iOS mobile app.
Receive incoming messages directly from your customers.
Get your own 5 digit shortcode.
Find out more about the SMS solutions we offer here.
Integrate using our API and send SMSes automatically.
Take a read through our APIs and see what suits you.
Featuring our infographics, how to’s and industry specific use cases.
A useful resource for those with questions. FAQ’s and video tutorials.
A look into how our customers are innovating with our products.
Practice safe sending. Check out the regional regulations for your country.
Highlighting the current trends and hottest news in the messaging industry.
Log into your BulkSMS.com online account here.
Log into the BulkSMS Integration Gateway here.
By Dr Pieter Streicher, Managing Director BulkSMS.com. Uploaded on: 01 May 2012.
Despite SMS’s amazing longevity and the ability to adapt it for a range of personal and business communication needs over the last two decades, SMS is not immune to misuse that may result in devaluing it as a communications channel. This is why it is imperative that businesses and consumers fight to maintain the integrity of SMS messaging or risk losing it due to inboxes overflowing with spam.
SMS’s value, both to businesses and consumers, is that it is instantly received
and often immediately acted upon. SMSs are on the increase while phone calls
are on the decrease thanks to this immediacy combined with the asynchronous
nature of SMS. An SMS doesn’t demand an immediate reply, although it is likely
to happen, unlike a ringing phone or a beeping instant message.
In fact, ironically, mobile instant messaging has become so persistent and
invasive that people have resorted to switching off the beeping notifications
and instead rely on SMS to initiate instant messaging chats with friends. This
fits into a consumer trend towards cutting down the mobile noise to avoid
negatively impacting their work and lifestyle.
Unfortunately, if unscrupulous companies abuse the SMS channel it could suffer
the same fate: with a deluge of unwanted marketing communications, people could
also switch of the sound of SMS notifications, rendering the channel unusable
for legitimate business communications. This would impact negatively on the
sending of all application-to-person (A2P) SMSes, especially mission-critical
alerts and notifications.
In fact, just that happened in India in 2011, where all A2P messaging was
affected due to a government attempt to curtail the extraordinarily high levels
of spam SMS messages Indian cellphone users were receiving. For now, South
Africans face far less spam SMS than Indians do and even though our A2P market
is mature by worldwide standards. We receive on average 10 A2P SMSes per month.
Typically there are two ways to reduce spam over SMS: raising prices or via
regulation. While the former is what was needed in India, where SMS prices are
extremely cheap, Iâ€™d argue against this for South Africa. The thinking behind
rising SMS prices is that it impacts the return on investment of the spammers
â€“ but in South Africa SMS prices are high enough for this to already be the
case. Any price increase will only benefit the operators, it will certainly not
benefit businesses that will pay more for SMSs and this will likely reduce
their use of SMS services, resulting in consumers receiving fewer legitimate
In South Africa, I’d argue we need to support our already very good regulatory
framework - in our case a self-regulatory system via the Wireless Application
Service Providers’ Association (WASPA). As a starting point, businesses should
ensure their SMS lists are permission based, opt-in databases so that they
themselves aren’t sending SMS spam unintentionally.
Secondly, as the WASP industry we need to take a long-term view that ensures
the continued innovation of the SMS channel, rather than just looking to make a
quick buck through flouting current industry regulations. These actions impact
negatively on general consumer opinion on the merits of the industry through
the unscrupulous actions of a few players.
Thirdly, industry self-regulation is itself hugely effective as it is nimble
enough to adapt to changing technology, industry developments and challenges.
The industry, businesses and consumers should actively support this
self-regulatory approach over other attempts to manage the mobile messaging
Consumers play an important role in alerting WASPA to suspected spam by lodging
complaints with the regulator. WASPA is able to follow-up on complaints via the
WASP and insist the sender show where they sourced the recipients’ details. In
the past, consumers might have been frustrated by WASPA being unable to
follow-up with complaints that originated from non-WASPA members. Currently
almost all A2P SMS messages can be traced to a specific WASP.
The bottom line is that if SMS spam increases, it degrades the integrity of the
channel for all users, eventually resulting in the demise of SMS messaging.
However, if the channel is used legitimately, ethically and innovatively, it
increases SMS’s value for all users. The day the consumer starts switching off
their SMS notifications marks the start of the end in SMS’s usefulness as a
valuable alert mechanism, which is why it is important for all stakeholders,
mobile network operators, WASPs, technology providers, digital agencies,
brands, civic associations and consumers - to fight the increase in SMS spam.